12. Questions 13, 14, 15 & 16


Descartes Meditations is studied as part of a philosophy course. A student was asked to following questions requiring paragraph answers rather than essay answers. The number in brackets is the number of marks available and is an indication of the minimum number of discrete points that should be made in an answer.

Answer the following questions:

  1. What did Descartes aim to achieve in his Meditations? (3)
  2. In the deceiving God argument, why does Descartes conclude that he could doubt any one of his former beliefs? (2)
  3. How successful is the deceiving God argument? (3)
  4. Explain the role of the malicious demon hypothesis in Meditation 1. (2)

*** chatGPT says ***

  1. In his Meditations, Descartes aimed to provide a foundation for knowledge that could not be doubted. He sought to establish a method of inquiry that could lead to certain and indubitable knowledge, by systematically doubting everything that he previously believed to be true. Ultimately, he hoped to arrive at a firm foundation of knowledge upon which to build a systematic philosophy.
  2. In the deceiving God argument, Descartes posits the idea of a supremely powerful and deceitful God who could manipulate his thoughts and perceptions, even making him believe in things that are false. Since he cannot be certain that such a God does not exist, he concludes that he could doubt any one of his former beliefs. This is because, if there is a deceiving God, then his perceptions and beliefs could not be trusted as a reliable source of knowledge.
  3. The success of the deceiving God argument is a matter of debate. Some philosophers argue that it effectively establishes radical doubt and undermines many of our ordinary beliefs, while others have criticized it for being overly skeptical and for relying on dubious assumptions. However, it is clear that the argument has been influential in the history of philosophy, and has stimulated much discussion and debate.
  4. In Meditation 1, Descartes introduces the hypothesis of a malicious demon who could systematically deceive him about the nature of reality. This hypothesis serves as a tool for radical doubt, allowing Descartes to call into question even his most basic beliefs about the world. By considering the possibility of a malicious demon, Descartes is able to generate a powerful sense of skepticism that he can then use as a starting point for his philosophical inquiry. Ultimately, this hypothesis helps Descartes to establish a new foundation of knowledge that is free from doubt.


The bot has coped with these questions rather well. There is obviously a lot more that could be said in response to question thirteen and it looks as if the bot has limited its answer by following the instructions about the minimum number of discrete points. Although there is a bit of overlap in the points made I think they probably would earn the full three marks.

The bot also gains the two available marks for question fourteen.

We'll consider questions fifteen and sixteen separately.