Doing philosophy with chatGPT

Its first answer to question three would merit only one of the two available marks, gaining the mark because it has at least proffered an argument. If we are counting its response when it was asked question three independently of questions one and two it would gain both marks.

It loses a mark in question four because it misidentified the fourth argument as a serial argument, mistaking a causal connection for a logical inference.
From then on it gains full marks. So, it gains either 28 or 29 out of a possible 30. Not bad.

Now let's see how it does on the Descartes short answer questions.